Complicated conversations or convoluted archetypes? Higher education curriculum in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i104a11%20Keywords:
curriculum transformation, higher education, South Africa, decolonisation, posthumanism, neoliberalism, complianceAbstract
Universities are identified as change agents, and curriculum as the instrument. Conflating the curriculum practice and graduate attributes or outcomes in South African higher education policy results in a simulacrum of education. Complicated conversations about curriculum are needed now: radically reimagining education's purpose and methods, holistically, relationally, and responsively. The dominant assumptions about curricula are rarely interrogated, as universities and regulators fail to engage in complicated conversations about educational transformation across all the domains implicated in higher education, from student to state policymakers. This conceptual paper examines the formulation of 'curriculum' as blueprint for the transformation of education in South Africa. Policies governing curricula prioritise employability and skills over transformative learning, limiting student and academic agency alike. Drawing on research undertaken for the CHE and USAf on conceptions of curriculum transformation in South Africa, this reimagining of curriculum encourages the complex and subversive conversations currently marginalised by compliance-driven practice.